‘Non’- Romantic Sectarianism

If your Lord had pleased, surely all those who are on the earth would have believed, all of them; will you then force men till they become believers?

__ Quran 10.99

Originally published in Daily News Egypt

Beni Suef– A story of romance has turned ugly and led to eruption of another round of sectarianism in Egypt. Rana El-Shazli, a 21-year-old Egyptian Muslim woman, is believed to have converted to Christianity and fled to Turkey with a Coptic Christian man.

Although interfaith relationships are common across the globe, it is a taboo in Egypt, conversion to and from Islam is always a tricky, sensitive topic in Egypt; however, in the current tense atmosphere, the situation has turned into a tragic story of exploitation. Angry Islamists attacked St George Church in Beni Suef, occasionally with Molotov cocktails, and forced Christians to close their shops for nearly eight days last month. Members of the Christian man’s family have been arrested, including his mother and father, after a prosecutor accused them of collaborating in hiding the woman.

The details of this ongoing tragedy reflect the wider ills of the Egyptian society and why sectarianism is on the rise. 

First, the rumours: There are conflicting reports about the story, and whether Rana has run away with a Muslim or a Christian man. Some suggested that Rana has contacted her family to reassure them that she is safe, and she left out of her free will, and denied any pressure from any one, yet her family, together with a wider support group by some Islamist groups, has refused to accept this narrative and insists that she has been kidnapped by the church.

Second, the exploitation: Many Islamic groups have taken advantage of the anger and grief of Rana’s family to stir troubles. Leaflets were distributed across town giving the church an ultimatum; either to return the girl or face “consequences”.

Third, collective blame: To the Islamists, the church has controlled, plotted, and facilitated the kidnapping. None of them asked the simple question: why? Why would any church, after endless attacks on many Christians over the last few years, embark on such endeavours for the sake of one girl? Islamists’ irrationality has led them to demonise churches, regardless of logic or common sense.

It is worth mentioning that there is a record of Coptic girls who were converted to Islam, some out of their free well; others were “allegedly” forced to convert. Ironically, for the Islamists, it is always a one-way street; Coptic girls (single or married) are welcomed to join Islam, even after unsanctioned romance without the consent of their families, but the same rules are not accepted by the Islamists to be applied to Muslim girls. Such hypocrisy is another reason behind this tragic type of sectarianism.

Fourth, the authority: Everyone in the town knows exactly who distributed anti-Coptic leaflets, inciting violence against the Coptic Church, yet no arrest has been made. The government also decided to adopt the kidnapping narrative and informed Interpol to try to arrest the couple, despite the fact that Rana is 21, has travelled legally to Turkey and is fully responsible for her own actions.

Violence triggered by rumours, stirred by exploitation and collective blame has become the new-norm in Egypt, and it is compounded by the government’s unprofessionalism, incompetence, and even complicity.

If Rana has indeed converted to Christianity, then she is not the first Muslim to convert and will not be the last; cases of conversions to and from Islam happen frequently. The reasons behind Rana’s tragedy probably lie inside her family home. Rather than stirring the flame of sectarianism, her family should ask themselves serious questions before they start to blame others: Did they support their daughter enough? Were they willing to listen, or did they threaten and intimidate her?

Furthermore, Islamist groups must understand that only the love of God can protect Muslims against leaving Islam. If Islamists teach love, they would be rewarded with love, but teaching hate could bring desertion and vulnerability. Most Muslims who leave the Islamic faith usually have struggled with questions about their religion that most scholars forbid even discussing, and the climate of intimidation, particularly against women.

Freedom from Islam is entrenched inside Quranic teaching: “So let him who please believe, and let him who please disbelieve.”  It is hypocritical to force anyone to be a Muslim while his/her heart is somewhere else. Individuals are responsible for their choices, and for any consequences or future regrets. Patriarchy strips people from their individual responsibility; it is about time to treat Egyptians as mature adults.

Nonetheless, the Egyptian government must also help to solve the crisis. First, it must stop the tension in Beni Suef; radical groups must understand that inciting violence is a crime that should be punished. The soft, diffident approach toward Islamists will not work. Second, the Egyptian embassy in Ankara can offer counselling services and logistic support for Rana, should she decide to return to Egypt at any time, as honour killing could easily be her fate, despite her family’s “kidnapping narrative”.  This is precisely why the family also needs counselling: The bereaved parents are understandably shocked and angry, but also under the influence of many radical groups that may inspire them to blame and even murder their own daughter if she returns to Egypt.

There is already a lot of hypocrisy, confusion and anger in Egypt; let’s not add more. Egyptian women should not be used as weapons in the ongoing, dirty sectarianism. Enough is enough.

About nervana111

Doctor, blogger and Commentator on Middle East issues. The only practising doctor who write in Middle Eastern politics in UK.
This entry was posted in Egypt, Islam, Politics, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to ‘Non’- Romantic Sectarianism

  1. Salama says:

    ‘Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him’ Hadith – Sahih Al-Bukhari
    It’s as simple as that.


    • nervana111 says:

      no, it is not as simple as that. The is a weak Hadith, and many dispute it. Plus you guys are very good to exclude Hadith from its circumstances in order to generalise and trivialise matters. Shame.


      • Salama says:

        HADITH is a science, it has its men and scholars. Now, for you to label a certain text as “weak” without the proper education is just hilarious!
        Why do people think that carpentry for example requires certain education and experience, while Religion is for every one to speculate about and be a Mufti?!!
        The Hadith I mentioned BTW is as sound\strong\authorized as they come!.. It is in Bukhari, Dawood, Albany etc.


  2. nervana111 says:

    Thanks for the the teaching lesson, I am not coming from latin America BTW for you to enlighten me with the greatest revelation that Hadith is a science. I am also not here to be dragged into theological debate.
    You are a Salafi because you look at religion from a black and white lens, that is why it is a simple matter, no wonder many turn radicals.
    I am not a Salafi for a reason, because I simply believe God gave human a choice: To believe or not to believe, born Muslim is NOT a choice.
    You guys want an Ummah of hypocrites, I want a healthy society.
    You guys can kill easily, empowered by Hadith, I want people to think before they kill.

    Finally, I am still grateful that you read my piece and thank you for the discussion.


  3. Iason says:

    Salama, Albany is not a strong source for hadith; Albany is an animal who should be hunted down and slaughtered. Is this a sufficiently black&white lens for you to understand what I’m saying?


  4. Islamic Feqqeh or Jurisprudence is indeed a legal science that is innocent of the Salafi a-historic ignorance and authoritarian interpretation to suit their narrow purposes and understanding of Islam which is mostly focused on supremacist view of Salafi man over all non other, be it a woman, a non Muslim man or a Muslim non Salafi man. So the goal is clear, advance the superiority of the Salafi man over all else, and come up with any religious texts to suit that goal.

    The Azahari Jurist of Faqeeh Dr. Khaled Abu el Fadel who also happens to be Professor of Islamic Law at UCLA wrote a wonderful book called “Speaking in the Name of God, the Authoritative and Authoritarian in Islam” discussing in details the principles of “agency” as in who do I go to for fettwa or responsa and who do I treat as knowledgable and scholar and then proceeded to write how can a fettwa be generated, the Islamic Sharia rules for reaching a conclusion from understanding of the facts, to understanding of the law and applying the law to the facts and then looking at the probabilities and reasoning. Sharia or Islamic Law can indeed be beautiful thing if applied correctly and thoughtfully not to suit supremacist whims.

    An important part of the work of Abu el Fadel and many other Islamic Jurists is evaluating Hadiths and what is clear is that many Hadiths that have made it into Bukhari and Sahiah and other so called validated texts are bogus hadith. Many of these bogus Hadiths were self serving and rigorous “scientific” evaluation can show why they were created and who they serve as well as their inherent contradictions with more proven Islamic texts, AA


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s