Suheir Atassi’s swimsuit and our moral bankruptcy


Suheir Atassi Image

Syria’s Suheir Atassi

Millions of women around the world do this daily without attracting much attention, but recently, Suhair Atassi, a prominent, secular Syrian opposition figure was spotted wearing a swimsuit at a Turkish resort. When photos of her appeared in social media, a vicious campaign, mainly in Arabic, was unleashed.

It was shocking and painful to read the comments on Twitter by many, both men and women, pro and anti-Syrian regime, pro and anti Islamic State, openly insulting Atassi and describing her with disgusting descriptions. It was as if Atassi’s body became a unifying figure for most Syrians, regardless of political stances. They indulged in demonizing and demeaning her, with varying arrays of excuses.

In a brutal civil war, as in Syria, it is perhaps expected that Atassi’s opponents, the Assad regime’s supporters, would brutally attack her politically as part of their campaign to discredit their opponents. What is stunningly sick, however, is to see anti-Assad supporters join in the dirty campaign against Atassi, under the context that she was wearing a revealing swimsuit.

The hemorrhagic fever that infects people against women in swimsuits is an insidious disease in the Arab world, not just in Syria. I personally experience it in many Arab countries, when men stare at women wearing swim attire in an ugly rude invasive way. The same patriarchal mindsets that justify sexual harassment detest women who dare to wear swimsuits. For that mentally ill bunch, which is unfortunately not a minority, women are the ones to blame for bringing such behavior by wearing revealing clothes.

The Atassi’s story also has another disturbing side____ the infringement of privacy. In Islamic teaching, it is not permissible to infringe on a woman’s privacy, and this must certainly include taking photos of her without her consent. Islam respects the privacy of women to a degree that Sharia places an impossible condition regarding the need to have four witnesses to press charges of adultery. This tenet is conveniently ignored by conservative Islamists who are now blatantly infringing upon Atassi’s privacy. That is alone is shocking.

Some have tried to justify the photos because they were taken in a public place (a hotel), as if that is a valid excuse. The fact that Atassi was at a hotel does not entitle any one to take a photo of her without her permission. More disturbingly, the photo was taking in Turkey, the patron of Syrian opposition. This indicates the high probability that whoever took the photo was possibly an opposition supporter. More recently, some opposition figures have expressed support for Atassi, albeit late.

It is worth noting that the Islamic factions within the Syrian opposition have very conservative agendas. The first thing that opposition groups have done in their controlled areas was to enforce conservative dress codes on women, an act that only highlights their shallow definition of freedom and democracy. Atassi has also been criticized for her performance, and she was forced to resign as head of the Syrian National Coalition’s Assistance Coordination Unit in 2013.

Nonetheless, in wartime, people tend to unite against their enemies and leave their differences aside, at least until they prevail and win the war. This hurtful attack, using the flesh of one of their woman as weapon reflects some deep necrosis. A divided opposition cannot prevail against its enemy.

A third opposition group attacks Attasi under the premise of her living a life of luxury in comparison to the suffering of the Syrian people. Yet this bunch ignores the many male wealthy Syrians enjoying their lives in Lebanon and other countries while ignoring their fellow Syrians. Needless to say, for a politician who spends most of her time in meetings, usually in hotels, using the facilities is hardly a luxury.

Meanwhile, most liberal and intellectual Arabs and Muslims have opted to remain silent on the Atassi case, while yelling and criticizing Western countries like Switzerland for banning face veils. Their passionate defense of freedom to cover-up was only matched by their deafening silence for the right of Atassi to dress as she pleases.

The story of Atassi and her swimming attire highlights how our societies have reached an alarming level of moral bankruptcy. Atassi may not be Syria’s best politician, but she should not be judged for wearing a swimsuit. We Muslims have betrayed our basic values as humans and practitioners of this faith. We are now willing to join in a frenzied scrum via the very non-Islamic act of infringing upon a woman’s privacy, solely for political reasons. We have by every definition, reached a new low.

 

Post script

I will not publish Atassi’s swimsuit photos in this blog because they were taken without her permission.

 

 

 

 

 

 

About nervana111

Doctor, blogger and Commentator on Middle East issues. The only practising doctor who write in Middle Eastern politics in UK.
This entry was posted in Islam, Short Comments, Syria, women rights and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Suheir Atassi’s swimsuit and our moral bankruptcy

  1. Nisreen says:

    Thank you Dr Nervana, you diagnosed correctly what’s going on with Arab/ Islamic minds toward strong, succeful, confident women … But what can be the treatment ?

    Like

    • nervana111 says:

      Thank you for reading. Solutions are not easy, but I think, at least, we have to speak out and stand-up for our freedom. We have to fight regression before it ruins our societies.

      Like

  2. Shiyam Galyon says:

    Yikes! I didn’t know this happened, very upsetting.

    Like

  3. I support your opinion about freedom of women (and men). But, a big majority of Muslims, all over the world, wants to follow the Koran. Yes, there is plenty of hypocrisy among them. But, the Koran clearly wants women to cover most of their bodies. Best regards.

    Like

    • Two mistakes don’t make a right. Best regards.

      Like

      • nervana111 says:

        Freedom of choice is not a mistake. It is God who judge people so stop playing his role as if the Almighty is so impotent and need your help. Finally, save me your regards, I do not need it, and stay away from my page!

        Like

      • You published an opinion I disagree with. Nothing personal. That is why I send you my regards. All what I say is that The Koran asks women to cover themselves. Please read The Koran.

        Like

      • nervana111 says:

        Please Read the Koran? That is sheer arrogance. I know most of the Quran by heart, but unlike you I have a brain and see different interpretations, unlike you who cannot see except one indoctrinations. You made views clear, and I published them, any more will be trolling and you will be blocked.

        Like

  4. The Koran asks women to dress appropriately. Regards.

    Like

    • nervana111 says:

      Dear Mr. Saleh:
      Thanks for stating the obvious. the Koran “asks” not “order”. Needless to say, the Koran neither ask others to sneak and take photos without permission, neither sanction insulting women for the dress code.
      Regards.

      Like

      • In The Koran, there is no difference between God “order” and “ask.” Because God is both “powerful” and “merciful.” But, His message to women is the same: cover your body. Probably, to be nice and merciful to women, it is “ask.” Best regards.

        Like

      • nervana111 says:

        The definition of audacity, is to try to explain the Quran to a Muslim Arabic native speaker, but thank you. Hilarious that you ignored the second part of my initial reply: “the Koran neither ask others to sneak and take photos without permission, neither sanction insulting women for the dress code.” I guess because you have no answer, except bragging about your misogynic views on women.
        Regards.

        Like

Leave a comment